Pre-Midterm Evolution

“A machine is a tool containing one of more parts that uses energy to perform an intended action. Machines are usually powered by a mechanical, chemical, thermal, or electrical means, and are often motorized. Historically, a power tool also required moving parts to classify as a machine. However, the advent of electronics has led to the development of power tools without moving parts that are considered machines.” – Wikipedia

Our proposed concept for the final project stems from the idea of architecture as a machine for living, or more specifically, the human body. The functionality of the human body in and of itself is also often discussed a machine. We want to compound these human-centric concepts of machines, along with the literal process of creating a physical design machine, to create an incredibly intentional and user-specific architecture.

As we are learning about machines and experimenting with different processes of machining, we are recognizing the importance of defining highly specific variables and inputs. We want to create a machine where the human body is the input, with specific variables that vary between individuals.

After doing some initial tests using the body to create drawings, we realized that we needed to more deliberately control the factors and what parts of the human body are the “input”. We are going to next make a list of measurable factors (weight, height, length, ratio, width, etc) of various body parts and create a range to better understand what will best influence the machine with the most intention. We are also going to look at how various people walk, stand, sit, etc, in order to push our machine towards the idea of creating a varied architecture based on the human input.

 

SKETCHES

EXPERIMENTS

RESEARCH

 

 

EXPERIMENT 1

This first experiment consisted of exploring the path of the body when it pivotes on one foot 180 angle. We layed out paper on the floor and attached an elastic cord between Liz’s feet and in the middle attached a marker. She kept pivoting on one of her feet while we were hoping that the marker would therefore leave semi circle traces on the paper. This initial experiment did not work because the marker started rotating instead of staying vertical and straight. The lack of contact with the paper made us realize that we might be successful by adding many pens to contraption. Because pens were attached in many different direction, we believed that no matter how Liz would move, the pens would still get in contact with the paper.

img_9191

Unfortunately this experiment did not work because the tension in the eleastic had to be maitained in order to create the same “unit” of semi-circle, yet we were unable to maintain such control over it. Moreover, the more the elastic was in tension (which we would want) the less the markers would touch the paper and leave a trace.

EXPERIMENT 2

Our second experiment consisted of restraining the body. We were interested in exploring the limits of the body when its joint members are restrained. We started by restraining the knees together and the elbows together, then we followed by joining, with bungee cord, the right elbow with the right knee as well as the left elbow with the left knee. Previously, the pens did not  work as marker so we opted for ink on a sponge, where the sponge was then attached to Liz’s elbows and knees. The sponge would then trace every movement of Liz while she was moving on the paper.

img_6302 img_6304

Below are the four sponges used with their respective elastics. The sponges worked because they were successful in leaving marks on the paper, and one that is easily traceable.

img_5522

Below is the artifact that we were able to achieve. We started to notice two types of traces, curves and dots. We are then able to track how the human body moved, weather it was in steps(points) or by draging (lines)

img_9197

Overall we would say this experiment was pretty succesful in terms of results yet in order for us to include this within a mechanism we started to rethink the process. The input of the body could be a lot more controlled and monitored by doing so we would obtain better results because of the lack of randomness.

EXPERIMENT 3

This experiment was inspired by body movement, we wanted to create a link between a 2D drawing and a 3D movement. When the body moves, the four most important joint are knees and elbows, we narrowed it down to just the wrists as well as the waist for minimal movements. We started by attaching a piece of canvas to 2 bodies walking in two different directions. Each corners would be attached to the wrists of a person while the middle point would be linked to the waist. Finally we added four points of color dye onto the canvas and added a water bottle pendulum that wold sprinkle water on the canvas over time. The idea was that the water would liquefy the die and depending on the way the bodies moves the water would spread accordingly.

img_9347

The initial set up of the canvas. Each four deposits is a color that we were hoping would intereact with the drips of the water bottle.

img_9238

img_9240

We then took a piece of paper and pressed it onto the canvas in order to analyze the color mix that we obtained from the canvas.

img_9242

mov_9753-mov img_9196-mov img_9198-mov

\

 

 

img_6296 img_6295 img_6294

After doing some initial tests using the body to create a drawing, we realized that we needed to more deliberately control the factors and what parts of the human body are the “input”. We are going to next make a list of measurable factors (weight, height, length, ratio, width, etc) of various body parts and create a range to better understand what will best influence the machine with the most intention. We are also going to look at how various people walk, stand, sit, etc, in order to push our machine towards the idea of creating a varied architecture based on the human input.

 

 

 

 

MIDTERM NOTES>

handcraft influences that create the chaos to still be apparent

come up with how, or versions of how

what are you looking for, what are your desires for the machine/output

assigning language, taking a stance

still frame, capture motion

what does it mean

how it tends to act

how people move – concert grounds, when they go where

changing color at a certain frequency

it is an event, from two sides, multiple cameras at once

this is a shitty youtube version of a concert, make it “high-def”

all about perception

unseen force – immateriality (light vs. magnetism)

the universe organizes itself based on forces

assign language – attraction and repulsion

manipulation, in response, impression

1st run – structural, 2nd run – people, 3rd run…

the information is too pure

record process, sense of behavior, skipping at the end

Tomas Saraceno

ATTRACTION>

lure, pull, draw, force, influence, entice, engage

Architectural Implications:
 
REPULSION >
fight/hold/ward – off
drive/force/beat/push – back/away
aversion
opposition
resistance
non-compliant
Architectural Implications:

ps04open_2

Magnetic Curtain, Florian Kräutli

Link 1

Link 2

Magnetic Fabric

Magnetic Fabrics 1

Magnetic Fabrics 3

Magnetic Fabrics 4

screenshot-2016-10-24-14-33-22 screenshot-2016-10-24-14-33-29 screenshot-2016-10-24-14-33-35 screenshot-2016-10-24-14-33-41 screenshot-2016-10-24-14-33-53 screenshot-2016-10-24-14-34-17 screenshot-2016-10-24-14-34-24 screenshot-2016-10-24-14-34-37 screenshot-2016-10-24-14-35-09 screenshot-2016-10-24-14-35-17

img_6735 img_6736